Thursday, November 5, 2015

2013-14 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Receives Prestigious Reporting Award

Lafayette, Calif., Nov. 5, 2015. The California Grand Jurors’ Association has granted the Robert Geiss Excellence in Reporting Award for 2015 to the 2013-14 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury for its report, “Desalination and Alternatives: Water for a Thirsty County.”
The award was presented on November 2 at the association’s 34th annual conference held in Lafayette, California. Nell Griscom, foreperson of the 2013-14 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury, was at the conference to accept the Award.
Nell Griscom on the right, with Association Awards Committee Chair Barbara Sommer
The Grand Jury examined the issues facing both the City of Santa Cruz Water Department and Soquel Creek Water District as they attempted to manage their local water supply problems. Much of Santa Cruz County receives its drinking water from underground aquifers. Wells pump water from the aquifers to be treated and sent to homes and businesses. Many of the aquifers in the coastal areas are already contaminated or in danger of contamination due to saltwater intrusion caused by over-pumping. One way to protect the aquifers is to develop a regional plan to halt the intrusion where it has already occurred and to protect those aquifers yet to be tainted.
The City of Santa Cruz Water Department and Soquel Creek Water District entered into a plan to do this through the construction of a regional seawater desalination plant. However, due to strong and vocal opposition from a number of residents, the Santa Cruz City Council put a halt to the project a year before a scheduled public vote.
The Grand Jury reviewed the plans for the regional desalination project as well as other alternatives being considered. Jurors conducted extensive research and spoke with multiple water agencies, experts and local opposition groups. The subsequent report discusses each of the options currently available and makes the technical details easily accessible to lay readers. The color maps make the report more readable and aid the reader in understanding the complex matters discussed. In the report, the Grand Jury recommends that both agencies secure a supplemental water supply and that the City of Santa Cruz strongly consider reviving the regional seawater desalination plant.
The California Grand Jurors’ Association is a statewide nonprofit organization of current and former grand jurors throughout the state. The association’s mission is “to promote, preserve and support the grand jury system through training, education and outreach.”
The Robert Geiss Excellence in Reporting Award recognizes a grand jury report that is of high quality and has a positive impact on the community, as well as increasing awareness of the California grand jury system.
November 5, 2015
California Grand Jurors’ Association
Press Release. Contact Jim Ragan, Public Relations Director (805) 927-2723, jimragan@charter.net


[Monterey County] Carmel City Administrator resigns, effective immediately

Doug Schmitz, who came out of retirement 13 months ago to lead a Carmel City Hall that had been beset by firings, multiple lawsuits and a Monterey County Grand Jury investigation, announced Saturday he is resigning from the city administrator job, effective immediately.
In a letter he sent Saturday to Carmel Mayor Jason Burnett, Schmitz cited stress—brought on by professional and personal and family matters—as the reason for his sudden departure.
"As we have discussed, I have been under the care of [a] physician over the past month in regard to stress…yesterday my physician strongly told me I needed to make significant changes," Schmitz writes. "I came here to assist you, the council and the community in a time of turmoil. The issues of one year ago have passed and our recent discussions were directed toward the need for the selection of someone as city administrator who could make a long-term commitment to continue to rebuild the organization.
"This notification provides the council the opportunity to begin the process to find that individual," he writes.
Schmitz previously served as city administrator from 1983-1992.
A special meeting has been called for noon Monday at Carmel City Hall to formally accept Schmitz's resignation letter and to appoint an interim city administrator. Carmel Police Chief Mike Calhoun was asked to consider taking the interim job, but ultimately, it's up to City Council to decide, Burnett writes by text message.
Burnett sent word of the resignation in a letter to city employees on Sunday morning.
"Chief Calhoun will meet with each department [Monday] to hear any questions you may have and to reassure you that we will continue to work together as we continue our transition into the next year and beyond," Burnett writes.
Schmitz stepped in to help right the city after the departure of City Administrator Jason Stilwell. During Stilwell's time at the city, IT manager Steve McInchak was placed on administrative leave and the subject of a criminal investigation after city officials alleged he had improperly accessed sensitive files of other employees. No charges were ever filed.
McInchak died of a heart attack in October 2014. His family settled a lawsuit against the city for $275,000.
The city's chief building official, John Hanson, a 25-year employee, was fired in 2013 and also filed a claim against the city alleging they defamed him, discriminated against him for being a disabled military veteran and violated his contract. The city reinstated Hanson after paying $340,000 in exchange for dropping his lawsuit.
November 1, 2015
Monterey County Weekly: News Blog
By Mary Duan


RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Jail health care lawsuit settled

Blog note: this article references a 2012 grand jury report.
Riverside County has tentatively settled litigation that challenged the quality of medical and mental health care for inmates in the county’s five jails.
But how much it will cost taxpayers to improve that care is unknown, although the expense is likely to add millions of dollars a year to an already-squeezed county budget.
Officials announced the settlement Friday. The county Board of Supervisors agreed to the terms Tuesday during a closed-session meeting.
The jails are operated by the Sheriff’s Department.
“We don’t know the exact effect because the costs have not been determined,” Capt. David Teets said Friday. “We don’t have a lot of information right now.”
The proposed settlement, which needs court approval, ends litigation filed in 2013 by the Berkeley-based Prison Law Office in conjunction with a San Francisco law firm.
The civil rights class-action lawsuit, filed in federal court on behalf of four county jail inmates, sought a court order to correct what plaintiffs described as inadequate health care for the county’s roughly 3,900 inmates.
One inmate alleged he had to wait two months to see a doctor. Another said delays led to scar tissue build-up that prevented the safe removal of a temporary filter supplying blood to her heart.
A 2012 county grand jury report also criticized jail health care. A lack of staffing hindered inmates’ access to legally entitled mental health services, the jury found.
Prison Law Office has sued counties throughout California seeking jail improvements. It was one of the firms that sued the California prison system regarding crowded conditions.
In 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a court order that forced California to reduce its prison population by 33,000. That led to realignment, which shifted responsibility for certain low-level, nonviolent offenders from the state to counties.
Realignment sent inmates who previously would have done time in state prison to county jails. Riverside County’s jails were not designed to handle inmates with multiyear sentences, and the county was already under a federal court order to ease crowding.
“The aging jail population and incidence of mental illness in detention facilities have complicated efforts to provide services in jails statewide,” the county’s news release read.
The county lost more than $200 million in revenue due to the Great Recession of 2007-08, and that hurt detention health and other programs, the news release read.
To comply with the crowding court order, the county has released thousands of inmates early. A $330 million project will add more than 1,200 beds to the Indio jail, and officials are seeking up to $80 million in state funding to renovate the Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility in Banning and add space for educational programs.
MORE STAFFING
Lawyers for the county sought to dismiss the lawsuit, saying the inmates who complained about care did not take prescribed medicine and failed to attend medical appointments while in custody. The proposed settlement arose from mediation sessions between the parties, the county’s news release read.
Settlement terms call for increased staffing, telemedicine – the remote diagnosis and treatment of patients through communications technology – and telepsychiatry to expand jail health care services. Inmates will have an easier time requesting services, and inmates with certain disabilities “will be appropriately accommodated,” according to the news release.
Court-appointed experts will monitor the county’s compliance with the settlement, which drew praise from Supervisor Marion Ashley.
October 30, 2015
The Press Enterprise
By Jeff Horseman


Monterey County Jail battling inmate suicide

Blog note: this article references a 2014-15 grand jury report.
Three inmate suicides marred the first nine months of the year, but the Monterey County Jail is in the arduous midst of addressing needed improvements to prisoner safety and health care, authorities said.
With the problems recognized by the Sheriff’s Office and outlined in a class-action lawsuit as well as in a grand jury report, numerous changes are occurring at the jail in hopes of preventing another death.
This year's string of suicides began Feb. 26, when a Monterey County Sheriff’s deputy was conducting inmate checks around 2 a.m. and found Salinas resident Jorge Christian Cervantes Huerta, 34, hanging in his cell, according to a coroner’s report.
A second deputy arrived and helped the deputy cut down the inmate, and CPR was initiated. Paramedics also arrived on scene. Cervantes Huerta was transported to Natividad Medical Center but died about a week later from his injuries.
Then around 2:28 a.m. on March 24, a deputy found Soledad resident Sandra Lee Vela, 52, hanging in her cell. She had tied a sheet to the back left corner of her upper bunk, according to the coroner’s report. Staff attempted life-saving measures but Vela also died.
And around 3:13 p.m. on Sept. 16, Salinas resident Erick DeAnda, 24, was found unresponsive in his cell. Deputies and medical staff again tried life-saving measures, and DeAnda was taken to a nearby hospital where he later died, marking the third suicide by hanging at the jail for the year.
A 2014-2015 civil grand jury report cited inmate health and safety issues at the jail, and several of those same problems earlier led to a $4.8 million class action lawsuit filed in 2013 in federal district court by current and former inmates of Monterey Count Jail.
The suit, filed against Monterey County, the Sheriff’s Office and the jail’s medical provider, California Forensics Medical Group, Inc., alleged problems including insufficient custody staffing, inadequate inmate classification system, dangerous jail facilities that make it difficult to monitor inmates, overcrowding, and a lack of staff training.
In January, the court granted class action status to the case, and in April in a preliminary injunction, U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal ordered the jail to outline a remediation plan.
In May, the parties reached a tentative settlement of the case that included additional county funding to correct most of the substandard conditions alleged in the action, according to the grand jury’s report.
Monterey County Senior Deputy County Counsel Susan Blitch said the county is currently working with the court on mediating the issues of the case.
Plaintiffs' attorney Michael W. Bien, of Rosen Bien Galvan and Grunfeld LLP, further said the parties have been “making good progress” in ongoing meetings regarding the remediation plan.
“We always wish we’d be a little further ahead, but the parties are still working in good faith to reach an agreement,” he said.
“We’re hoping that some of the issues can be fixed and resolved very rapidly,” Bien added. “Others may take more time so it’s a process of agreeing on what will be the goals. Some of the goals are in the settlement agreement, and some we have to work through in these remedial plans. Once we have these established, there will definitely be a period of time where defendants are working on achieving the goals.”
An important component of the settlement is the appointment of five expert monitors who will review the defendants’ compliance in the areas of American Disabilities Act, mental health, medical care, general conditions of confinement and jail security, and dental care.
The monitors will make two, two-day inspections a year at the jail and report on their findings.
Suicide and suicide prevention has been one of the major issues addressed in the suit and part of the preliminary injunction that was granted, Bien said.
“One of the things that there’s no dispute about is defendants are going to be doing various things to try to reduce the risk of suicide in the jail,” Bien said.
One thing being done is to bring in consultants to work in identifying so-called "tie-off points" in segregation cells, that inmates can use to hang themselves.
For example, air vents have been used as tie-off points in hangings, and the county is considering replacement air vents that would have smaller holes that would make threading a fabric through more difficult.
Considering the magnitude of the project to retrofit existing cells, it will take time to complete, Bien noted. Other measures, such as limiting placement of mentally ill people in segregation, are also being explored.
“It’s an area of deep concern … The settlement agreement doesn’t expect to prevent each and every suicide, but there’s things we should be doing to reduce the risk,” Bien said.
In the meantime, a claim has been filed by Sandra Vela’s family against the county, jail and California Forensic Medical Group, alleging that jail staff should have been aware of Vela’s serious medical conditions, provided her with necessary medical and mental health care, and implemented adequate policies, procedures, training and supervision.
Vela had a history of various medical conditions including a seizure disorder, chronic pain, carpal tunnel syndrome, diabetes and depression, according to the coroner’s report. Her family noted in the claim that she had battled brain cancer, but the coroner's report reads that she actually had pseudotumor cerebri, which appears to be a brain tumor but is actually a build-up of cerebrospinal fluid
Medical records also showed she was being given Zoloft, an anti-depressant, but it didn’t show up in her toxicology screen.
She had been calling family daily since her arrest, and “the inmates housed with Vela that would speak with investigators said essentially Vela was having difficulties with her incarceration,” the coroner’s report reads. “Some said she was delusional, thinking other inmates were deputies. Vela was increasingly agitated and wanted to be released from jail. It appeared her incarceration had become too much for her to handle.”
In addressing the suicides, Monterey County Jail Chief Michael Moore said, “We’ve had more this year than we’ve had in a little while, but even one would be too much for us. It’s a serious concern we deal with.”
Each in-custody death is investigated by the Sheriff’s Office detective bureau as well as by administrators.
And as it completes those investigations and works on improving services, the agency continuously re-evaluates its policies and procedures, Moore said.
“Again, one death is too many for us. We have had an increase this year, and again I think a lot of it has to do with, not just the jail, but everyone’s lack of mental health resources,” Moore said.
Many counties are having problems with inmate suicides, he explained, and a shortage of mental health resources on the outside has increased the jail’s responsibility for some community’s most fragile people.
“Unfortunately we’ve become de facto mental health institutions at the jail, and we’re not equipped for that either,” he said.
Also, with Assembly Bill 109, which has certain inmates serve their time in county jail instead of state prison, the jail now cares for inmates that are serving much longer sentences than jails have been accustomed to.
“This jail was not built to be a mental health facility. It was built to be a jail where people got sentenced to less than a year, did their time here, there were some programs and you rehabilitated them,” Moore said. “And now with AB 109 and everything else, they’re doing 14 years in county jail.”
Additionally, while there was once a time when jail staff could get to know the inmates a little better and have a better chance to see  any warning signs, short staffing took away some of that opportunity, he explained.
The jail is now trying to fill 11 positions, but the application and training process can take up to a year.
“With the lack of staffing, they’re just trying to get the minimum stuff done, and with some of these other collateral duties we have now, with the lack of staff, it takes away some of that personal knowledge of what’s going on around them,” Moore said.
In the meantime, a major reorganization at the beginning of the month took 18 officers out of patrol and put them back on jail duty.
When Sheriff Steve Bernal was elected and Moore became jail chief in December, one of the first things they noticed was that there wasn’t a jail intake nurse screening people coming in, and that position was also put in place this spring, Moore said.
He added that many changes like that at the jail were not prompted by the lawsuit but rather were recognized by the new administration as critically missing components to a safe jail.
“We felt that that was very important for both the mental health side and just the medical side itself to identity people who may have some sort of problem before we get them into the jail,” Moore said.
Deputies already receive suicide prevention training, and the jail is in the process now of looking for a provider for additional training on prevention, awareness and handling those in mental health crisis, he said.
Moore said he's concerned about what happens to people who are suffering from mental health issues once they are released and is in talks with the behavioral health division to try to address some continuity of care for those released.
“It’s a tough process right now, because it’s the mental health resources we’re all lacking,” he said.
Moore underscored that the jail is never just trying one avenue to address inmate safety and reduce suicides.
“Our goal is ... they get released the same, but hopefully in better condition,” he said. “There’s no one in the Sheriff’s Office or on the corrections side, the jail, that doesn’t take an in-custody (death) seriously."
October 29, 2015
The Salinas Californian
By Chelcey Adami