November
7, 2014
San
Jose Mercury News
By Jason Green
Restoration and recreation are
two themes that have surfaced as part of the discussion over what to do with a
7.7-acre parcel that was recently added to Foothills Park in Palo Alto.
On Monday, the City Council and
the Parks and Recreation Commission are slated to hold a study session to mull
those ideas, as well as a third that would see environmental nonprofit Acterra
continue to operate a native plant nursery on part of the site, as it has since
2005.
"While it is exciting to
add this new acreage to our parkland inventory, any future plans for the site
must take into account current conditions and the potentially significant costs
of restoration," the commission wrote.
The paper noted that the soil
conditions of the parcel are poor due to its former use as a quarry.
Potential recreational uses
identified by the commission include a campsite, picnic area and off-leash dog
park. An open-sided structure could also be built on the parcel for special
events.
Acterra's lease for roughly
half an acre of the site expires in 2015 but it can be renewed, according to
the paper.
The question of what to do with
the parcel follows the council's decision in August to add it to Foothills
Park.
The family of Palo Alto Medical
Clinic founder Russel Lee granted the parcel to the city in 1981 with the
condition that it be used for conservation, "including park and recreation
purposes."
The city instead leased the
land from 1996 to 2005 to developer and adjacent property owner John Arrillaga,
who used it for "construction staging," according to a critical
report released in June by the Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury.
Arrillaga offered to purchase
the parcel in 2012 for $175,000. Although city officials told the grand jury
his bid was unexpected and unsolicited, an investigation revealed that they had
commissioned their own appraisal.
The grand jury report blasted
the council for meeting in a closed session to discuss the offer instead of
following an established public process for selling surplus public property.
The council's decision to add
the parcel to Foothills Park helped resolve the controversy and set the stage
for the Parks and Recreation Commission to begin exploring potential uses.
No comments:
Post a Comment