Stockton Unified School District has provided additional
responses to the June San Joaquin County Grand Jury report showing financial
mismanagement and dysfunction.
The follow-up response provides reasoning — not evidence — for
items the board disagreed with but provided no additional context in their
original August response. On a motion from Trustee Zachary Avelar, the board voted
5-2 at their Nov. 14 board meeting to approve the follow-up response to the
Grand Jury. Trustees AngelAnn Flores and Maria Mendez voted no.
At the meeting, there was confusion as to why the board was
providing additional response. SUSD’s contracted lawyer Dr. Jack Lipton told
the board the additional responses were drafted upon a request from the grand
jury. Interim superintendent Traci Miller said the follow-up letter was written
by legal counsel and interim Chief Business Official Joann Juarez.
Trustees Mendez and Flores both said they hadn’t seen the
request letter from the Grand Jury — no one on the board fessed up to actually
seeing the letter — and asked to be looped in. When asked by Mendez how he
obtained the letter, Lipton said he “did not recall specifically,” and did not
acknowledge he was able to produce the letter.
The school district has been unable to produce the letter in
question upon request by The Record. The San Joaquin County Grand Jury has not
responded to The Record’s request for the letter or clarification.
SJ schools chief:‘Disappointing’ SUSD board refuses to accept
it violated Brown Act
The board’s Nov. 15 follow-up states the board or district
“disagrees wholly” with six findings — it does not address the rest of the 50
findings — ranging from conflicts of interest and contracting issues to no
plans for ongoing costs and one-time fund expenditures. The board disputed
nearly half of the grand jury’s 50 findings in their first response.
Flores, who told The Record she sounded the alarm resulting in
two scathing Grand Jury reports and a state audit looking for fraud and illegal
fiscal practices that’s currently underway at the district, expressed her
outrage with the latest board response.
“I am a part of this (vote) and I agree with everything this
grand jury investigation says. Everything,” Flores said. “I speak for myself,
and everything I’ve seen up here firsthand for the last two years — this is
another spit in the face to our community, to our teachers, to our staff, our
students and our constituents. Please don’t put my name on this response ever,
because I am not in agreement with it.”
Flores, often the sole opposition to the current board
supermajority, is currently the only sitting board member with enough votes to
win reelection with 846 votes, more than double the runner-up in the Area 2
race. Trustees Scot McBrian and Avelar are both trailing by wide margins in
their bids for reelection to newcomers Sofia Colón and Kennetha Stevens, who
both ran on transparency and financial accountability. Donald Donaire is
handily ahead to replace Trustee Mendez, who is terming out, in the area 5
seat.
28,830 ballots remain to
be counted in the county as of Nov. 16, according to the San Joaquin County
Registrar of Voters.
The Record
Ben Erwin
November 17, 2022
1 comment:
Ben Irwin. Not Erwin.
Post a Comment