(Butte County) Letter: Demand accountability for city’s fiscal problems

August 26, 2014

Chico Enterprise-Record

On July 28, Michael Bush distributed criticisms of the 2013-14 Grand Jury report to the city of Chico.

Dismissing the report and its contributors, Bush absolved the City Council majority of responsibility for the current $21 million deficit.

Bush sarcastically attacked Councilman Mark Sorensen, former City Manager Brian Nakamura, and journalists who identified the council's lack of fiscal transparency.

He fantasized that Sorensen manipulated the Grand Jury by simply seeking raw data and detailed accountancy records to provide better budgetary oversight regarding alleged financial improprieties.

Bush disgracefully maligned the councilman whose work has been characterized by integrity and due diligence.

Bush embraced a comically conspiratorial view of the investigation as some plot directed against the council's liberal majority. Did he forget that Grand Jury foreman Chuck Nelson was an altogether reputable liberal?

Bush exemplifies the amnesia and blame-shifting that helped produce the city's financial predicament.

In 2007, the city's deficit was $6 million. Some predicted it might reach $56 million by 2017, a 900 per cent increase in 10 years. Today's deficit is $21 million, a staggering 250 per cent increase in seven years.

Since the debt skyrocketed by "only" 250 percent since 2007, Bush complimented the council majority.

Blinded by self-deception, he supports the habits of overspending. In praising the council majority for "doing something right," he holds it blameless for the festering budgetary mess.

Bush encourages citizens and council members alike to forget about past fiscal misbehavior and allow it to continue into the future.

— Charles Geshekter, Chico

(Santa Barbara County) Jury Still Out on Jail Funding

Supes Poke Holes in Report that Questions Funding Scheme

August 28, 2014

Santa Barbara Independent

By Lyz Hoffman

Santa Barbara supervisors this week poked holes in a Grand Jury report that faulted the county’s savings scheme for the North County Jail’s $17.3 million annual operating costs. Released in June, the report didn’t envision a successful execution of the plan  —  which has seen growing tax revenues set aside incrementally since 2011  —  or a strong likelihood that the board, now and in the future, would stick to it. Instead, the jury wrote, salary and budget freezes would likely join layoffs and tax hikes to make up the difference if the economy doesn’t yield the revenue needed for the plan to work.

But where the Grand Jury said the plan depended on property-tax increases of no less than 3.5 percent yearly, county officials countered that the funding plan actually only needs one percent growth to work. Similarly, the county won’t have to funnel as much as 28 percent of that growth to its savings account (as the report hypothesized) but can manage with smaller allotments. The Grand Jury took particular issue with how the plan would function in conjunction with the extra property-tax monies going toward County Fire, a move approved in 2012; coupling that slice of the pie with the jail’s would mean dwindling dollars for other departments, the jury warned. But county number crunchers say there will still be more than 70 percent of tax growth left over for other departments.

Where the Grand Jury made a good point, county staff said, was in its finding that the Assessor’s office could benefit from more employees to handle its workload. Last year, said Clerk-Recorder-Assessor Joe Holland, his office didn’t finish all the work it needed to for the first time in 12 years. He cited staffing reductions and lack of time and resources to train new hires. Holland said three new appraisers and one new analyst would help.

Supervisor Doreen Farr pointed to how the supervisors dealt with the recession as a litmus test for how the county will fare with its jail-funding plan. “We were really tested over the past five years, and we did what had to be done, and we kept county government going. That is our responsibility,” she said. “I know we’ll deal with it successfully.”