Supes Poke Holes in Report that Questions Funding Scheme
August
28, 2014
Santa
Barbara Independent
By
Lyz Hoffman
Santa Barbara supervisors this
week poked holes in a Grand Jury report that faulted the county’s savings
scheme for the North County Jail’s $17.3 million annual operating costs.
Released in June, the report didn’t envision a successful execution of the plan — which has seen growing tax revenues set aside incrementally
since 2011 — or a strong likelihood that the
board, now and in the future, would stick to it. Instead, the jury wrote,
salary and budget freezes would likely join layoffs and tax hikes to make up
the difference if the economy doesn’t yield the revenue needed for the plan
to work.
But where the Grand Jury said
the plan depended on property-tax increases of no less than 3.5 percent yearly,
county officials countered that the funding plan actually only needs one
percent growth to work. Similarly, the county won’t have to funnel as much as
28 percent of that growth to its savings account (as the report hypothesized)
but can manage with smaller allotments. The Grand Jury took particular issue
with how the plan would function in conjunction with the extra property-tax
monies going toward County Fire, a move approved in 2012; coupling that slice
of the pie with the jail’s would mean dwindling dollars for other departments,
the jury warned. But county number crunchers say there will still be more than
70 percent of tax growth left over for other departments.
Where the Grand Jury made a
good point, county staff said, was in its finding that the Assessor’s office
could benefit from more employees to handle its workload. Last year, said
Clerk-Recorder-Assessor Joe Holland, his office didn’t finish all the work it
needed to for the first time in 12 years. He cited staffing reductions and lack
of time and resources to train new hires. Holland said three new appraisers and
one new analyst would help.
Supervisor Doreen Farr pointed
to how the supervisors dealt with the recession as a litmus test for how the
county will fare with its jail-funding plan. “We were really tested over the
past five years, and we did what had to be done, and we kept county government
going. That is our responsibility,” she said. “I know we’ll deal with
it successfully.”
No comments:
Post a Comment