August
5, 2014
Insurancenewsnet.com
By
Eric Vodden, Appeal-Democrat, Marysville, CA
Aug. 05--Yuba County grand jury
recommendations to remove two Marysville red-light cameras and limit right-turn
violations at two others would not be followed under a proposed response to the
jury's report.
The City Council tonight will
consider its formal response to the June report that took on the automated
computer controlled cameras designed to catch red-light runners in the city.
In it's proposed response, the
city would not implement recommendations to remove red-light cameras at Third
and F streets and at 10th and Ramirez streets. At both locations the grand jury
recommended "engineering countermeasures" to minimize right-turn
violations.
At Third and F, the proposed
response states "there is no opportunity to have a right-turn green arrow
without creating a safety hazard" at the intersection.
At 10th and Ramirez, it notes
the intersection could accommodate improvements for eastbound right-turn
movements.
A future project could add
signals to allow a right-turn during the signal phase for northbound movements,
it states.
But "other than during
that phase, right turns would still require a stop on red to insure it is safe
to proceed," the proposed response says.
The council will consider the
17-page response during its 5 p.m. meeting in the council chambers in City
Hall. The meeting is being held earlier to allow council members to attend this
evening's National Night Out gatherings.
The 2013-14 grand jury report
released in June devotes more than a quarter of its 202 pages to red-light
cameras. The report determined Marysville "has provided conflicting,
nonrelevant and/or unsupportable data to justify the use of red-light cameras
within city boundaries."
The city is under no obligation
to follow any of the grand jury's recommendations, but it is required to file a
formal response within 90 days.
Of 11 red-light camera
safety-related recommendations, the proposed response states the city will not
implement nine and that no action is required on the other two.
The proposed response also
states that no action is required on four of five recommendations related to
red-light camera accounting practices. Another related to the posting of
red-light camera revenues and expenses online will not be implemented, the response
says.
No comments:
Post a Comment