Six weeks ago, the [Santa Cruz] grand jury urged fire operation improvements
Crews
this week are battling one of the most devastating wildfires in the history of
Santa Cruz County, less than two months after the county grand jury admonished
the county to improve its firefighting operations.
As
of this writing, approximately 48,000 residents from Santa Cruz and San Mateo
counties had to move out of their homes swiftly as the out-of-control CZU
August Lightning Complex fire swept through brushland and forests. Big Basin
Redwoods State Park has been destroyed and at least 50 structures have been
lost, though the toll is likely to rise to “triple digits” after a full
accounting is made once the smoke clears, a Cal Fire official said Thursday.
Only
last month, the Santa Cruz County grand jury released a scathing indictment on
fire readiness in the county, warning that “residents are at increased risk of
fire danger due to the lack of risk management for wildfire.” It’s unlikely
that the systemic improvements recommended by the grand jury might have stopped
the devastation currently taking place; lightning-ignited fires throughout
California have stretched firefighting resources thin this week. At least 1,700
firefighters were working fires in Monterey and Santa Cruz counties on
Thursday, and those fires were only four of approximately 300 fires reported
throughout California.
The
grand jury entitled its 97-page report “Ready? Aim? Fire! Santa Cruz County on
the Hot Seat.”
At
issue is the relatively large “wildland urban interface” in Santa Cruz County
that seems to be complicated by an overly tangled system of bureaucratic
management.
The
interface, known in fire-suppression circles as WUI, is defined by the U.S.
Forest Service as communities located in areas conducive to large-scale
wildland fires with the potential of posing significant threats to human life
or property. In Santa Cruz County, more than half of all residents live in WUI
zones. The Forest Service reports that Santa Cruz has the largest percentage of
WUI of all the California counties.
According
to the grand jury, fire prevention and suppression systems in the county are
parceled out to what it refers to as a “dizzying nature” of different fire
districts, community service areas, state fire battalions and city fire
departments. The grand jury noted that counties with much larger populations,
like Los Angeles County and Contra Costa, manage to administer complicated fire
operations from a single administrative department.
The
grand jury even drew up an organizational chart to illustrate the dramatic
differences in the three counties.
The
grand jury also criticized the county for updating its hazard response plan
every five years, saying it should be happening more often due to the large
number of people living in WUI. It also noted that, among other things, too
many fire agencies in the county are not filing standard response reports, that
communication among some agencies and citizens is sporadic, that potential
access routes during evacuations are not clearly defined.
Interestingly,
the grand jury specifically notes that a wildlife alert camera used as an early
detection device, located on a peak near Bonny Doon, does not adequately track
the surroundings with unobstructed views. That camera was destroyed Wednesday
night by the CZU August Lightning Complex fire; the camera recorded its own
immolation.
In
the end, the grand jury came up with 30 different findings that noted
deficiencies in the overall operations of fire suppression, including
inefficiencies in administration, alerts and public education. And it had 25
recommendations for improvements, including a recommendation that the county
should consider a governing structure that would tie all fire agencies together
“with common leadership, objectives, sharing of data, and maximized use of
resources.”
The
need for improvements is growing ever more critical, according to the grand
jury.
“As
the specter of climate change increases, so does the fear and likelihood of
more wildfires in populated areas,” according to the report. “It is now
abundantly clear that climate change has had, and will continue to have, a
powerful impact on large scale fire risk in California.”
In
its introduction, the grand jury noted that Santa Cruz County residents “would
benefit from greater efficiency and transparency from the multitude of fire
agencies in the county, with the goal of improving preparedness and response.”
voicesofmontereybay.org
By Joe Livernois
August 21, 2020
1 comment:
Fire is such as tragedy. I am noticing that the same issues are true in San Mateo County, specifically in the Unincorporated areas. Perhaps it is a sense of "woulda coulda shoulda", but I really feel that this Lightning Fire is or SHOULD BE a huge wake-up call to focus more attention and funding in order to be more Proactive about making our communities "Fire Ready" including clearing vegetation from the sides of roadways in order to more easily evacuate. One only needs to watch the Frontline PBS Special - Fire in Paradise https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3OX1PR2SCM&t=1428s
or read the last 20 pages of the 2018-2019 Butte County Grand Jury Report where they recapped the CAMP FIRE- LESSONS LEARNED. https://www.buttecourt.ca.gov/GrandJury/reports/2018-2019%20Grand%20Jury%20Report.pdf
Post a Comment