If I had a penny for
everyone who associated the Civil Grand Jury with a courtroom trial, I would be
a very wealthy woman. Nobody seems happy to see the official organization on
their doorstep for an unannounced inspection, and it never ceases to amaze me
that even many elected officials do not know the occupation of the Civil Grand
Jury.
Admittedly, until 22 years
ago, I was just as uninformed until I responded to the court’s posting for
applicants. Since that time, I have been empaneled by the presiding Judges,
Sanders, Tobias and Rodrigues for a total of six fiscal year terms; four of
those have been appointments as the Foreman. The first year, I held the
position of Secretary, so I did a lot of listening and participated on the
editorial team for the annual report that would be received by the leading
officials who make important decisions about policy and funding.
It was fascinating to
learn the jurisdiction of the panel whose purpose was to represent all the
persons in the “We, the People” of the entirety of the County of San Benito and
City of Hollister and San Juan Bautista. Here I am all these years later and
the total population of San Benito County has increased exponentially to 65,000
people supported by scores of departments and agencies: law enforcement; safety
departments such as water, fire, health, and airport and hospitals, add
transportation districts and contracted providers such as ambulance services.
The school districts,
parks and recreation areas are also within the purview of the Civil Grand Jury.
As the Foreman, I had the responsibility to oversee the training of 19-members
through research, reviews, interviews, inspections, and investigations of the
many entities. Although the only single charge is to “look into the local
prisons or jails” the broad spectrum gets an overview in cycles, some more
often than others and in varying degrees of depth.
The purpose of action is
to promote good governance by observing, noting findings, then making
corresponding recommendations to the principals of the Board of Supervisors and
City Council, and they have the duty to respond in writing within 90-days, to
1) “agree”, 2) “partially agree”, or 3) “disagree” with the jurors.
The high degree of
confidentiality may be one of the reasons that the public is unaware of the
important functions of the civil grand jury. The meetings are held in secret
session, interviews conducted of one person at a time, and the witnesses are
only known to the Grand Jury and never identified by name or rank. They are
also admonished to not speak to anyone of the nature of the investigation or
interviews, as a broken admonishment may be punishable by law.
As an arm of the Superior
Court of California, the Grand Jury has subpoena powers to bring forth
witnesses and may also receive written public complaints, or even grievances
against local officials, by mail addressed to a private mailbox and may only be
opened by the jury officers. The Grand
Jury has the legal relationship of the county counsel or even state attorney,
and sometimes, malfeasances may be reported to the district attorney for
prosecution.
In six terms, I have been
involved with over 100 jurors armed with the power of the badge, to go about
their work with due diligence in the business of The People. There have been
positive Grand Jury achievements because of dedicated jurors, although there
are some issues that take several terms to make the changes recommended by the
panelists.
For instance, there were
uncollected local fees and fines that totaled a million dollars that got the
attention of the Grand Jury, and the old animal shelter was replaced, largely
due to the repeated annual inspections of the facility. Outdated systems and
technologies were inspected and replaced by newer and more efficient means.
The body of the jurors is
comprised of individuals of all walks of life, various professions represented,
and their diversity has been a unifying factor in the many friendships that
continued beyond the term of appointment. The members come from varied
geographies; some born and raised right here in Hollister, but many more from
the San Jose and greater San Francisco Bay area as well as other states.
All cultures have been
represented and each has a story of interest. Ranchers, accountants,
technicians, and homemakers, doctors, lawyers, law enforcement professionals;
many with advanced degrees, sales-force employees and actively engaged
blue-collar workers have all taken a seat at the round table to participate by
contributing in observing our local government in action, and the resulting
improvements have been found by working together in seeking knowledge and
offering positive solutions.
The members have access to
staff to analyze budgets with line-item details and inquire about operations
from the taxpayer’s perspective. Jurors become become educated about the terms
of contracts, the scope of responsibility and write about those facts to
promote good governance.
For instance …
The Grand Jury can also
acknowledge positive aspects of the various departments and always seeks to
learn about the distinct character of our growing ag-based community. There are
many jurors who have enjoyed the adventure so much that they come back to
continue their education by serving additional terms. These people are the
history book and can carry their experience into a leadership role in guiding
new members into the timeline of productivity.
While I have served a
total of six years, this year’s term is blessed with the participation of John
Lemos, who has served four years, former Foreman Bob Marden serves as current
Pro-tem and other multi-term members include Michelle Gutierrez, Natalya
Gallion, Cherie Toll, and Bill Healy.
There are many varied
careers representing the badge from blue-collar to JD., MD. and PhD. and each
individual member has equal voice and vote. Strangers become familiar and there
is a true sense of camaraderie as politics are put aside to remain neutral and
objective towards the good of all within our boundaries of jurisdiction and we
are all happy to be here for the future of our community.
BenitoLink
By Roxy Montana
February 8, 2022
This Column was contributed by Civil Grand Jury Forman Roxy Montana, who has been on the San Benito County Civil Grand Jury for six years. The opinions expressed do not necessarily represent BenitoLink or other affiliated contributors.
Here we reproduce news and opinion articles in the print and electronic media since October 8, 2008, about each of our 58 county grand juries. Most are about grand jury reports. Our posting of these articles does not purport to reflect the opinions of CGJA or our members. We hope that this feature is a resource to grand juries, grand jury advisors, CGJA chapters, the media, and the public. Sponsored by the California Grand Jurors' Association, www.cgja.org/
Friday, February 11, 2022
COLUMN: The grand experience of the [San Benito] Civil Grand Jury
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment