October
18, 2014
Manteca
Bulletin
By Rose Albano
Risso
A member of the Manteca Unified
School District Board of Trustees is considering filing a complaint to the San
Joaquin County Grand Jury over “possible” Brown Act violations involving
Trustee Sam Fant.
The reason for the complaint
concerns Fant’s reported use of his cell phone during board meetings. Trustee
Nancy Teicheira said during board comments at the Oct. 6 meeting that she was
“investigating possible Brown Act violations, and I do believe when the
community has concerns it is our job to at least check them out.”
On Thursday, she said she was
ready to move ahead and do the filing.
In her board comment, she
explained that her investigation was being prompted by complaints brought to
her attention by members of the community who reported seeing Fant using his
cell phone during board meetings.
“It is my job to pass on the
complaint. It is up to the district to review and bring back to the board the
findings,” she further stated during her closing statement.
“I do believe when the
community has concerns, it is our job to at least check them out, no matter how
unpleasant it is, and I will continue to do the job our constituents want us to
do. And with that I thank our service men and women for making that possible.
It is with their sacrifices that we are able to speak freely, and for that I am
grateful. This nation was built on rules and regulations and the public expects
us to follow them. That is why they fight. And that is why it is always
important to thank our veterans,” she added in the usual way she closes all
board meetings, a verbal salute to all veterans.
Her actions apparently ruffled
some feathers during the closed session that preceded the public meeting of the
board, made evident by her opening statements in her closing comment: “Tonight,
I was accused of attacking fellow board members for actions that have been
done. But we were elected to represent the community, and when they have
complained to us it is our duty to report the incidents. So, it is not that I
am picking on fellow board members; it’s that the community has a concern.”
Teicheira, who is guaranteed
another four-year term since no one is challenging her in the November
elections, did not mention any names involving what had transpired during
closed session. She also did not disclose during the telephone interview on
Thursday the identities of the people who complained to her about Fant’s use of
his cell phone during board meetings.
• • •
Turmoil behind closed doors
However, the Manteca Bulletin
has learned from various sources that an ugly verbal altercation took place
between Teicheira and Fant over the latter’s use of his cell phone during the
closed-session meeting.
Fant reportedly got mad and
yelled at Teicheira, using an expletive, when she asked board president Don
Scholl if they are supposed to have their cell phones out during the meeting.
Fant reportedly yelled, “I’m tired of this s—t!” and added that Teicheira
needed to “grow up” and to stop picking on people.
Fant’s four-letter word
apparently shocked one board member who reacted to Fant’s outburst by turning
to him saying, “What did you say?”
That scene ended reportedly
with Scholl telling Fant that he needed to put his cell phone away.
“The rule is, we’re not
supposed to have our phone out because we could come under Brown Act
violations. Who knows who he’s on the phone with? If you have a rule, you
follow the rule,” said Teicheira, commenting on the complaints brought to her
attention by the concerned individuals.
• • •
Sam Fant responds; board
president Scholl comments
Fant admitted that he does have
his cell phone out during open board meetings but that he puts it on vibrate.
“We all have cell phones. Sometimes you pick up your phone but you don’t make a
phone call. To my knowledge, I haven’t seen any board member use it to make a
phone call or anything,” he said.
“In reference to what took
place in closed session, I can’t discuss that,” he explained. However, he
commented about “a board member on a witch hunt” which is causing “internal
turmoil.” He did not name names either.
He admitted to going online
during the last board meeting but that he used not his smart phone but the
district-issued tablet which is available to all board members during meetings.
At that meeting, he went online to clarify that the minimum wage increase in
California was going to take effect not in 2015 as it appeared in the board
agenda report but in 2016, he explained.
Board President Don Scholl said
he talked to Fant about his cell phone use after the concern was brought to his
attention. Scholl said Fant assured him that he has not been making any outside
communications with his smart phone.
Board policy No. 9012 states
that, “as all communications during a public Board meeting are subject to the
California Public Records Act, Board members will not use electronic
communication devices during Board meetings to communicate either internally or
externally.”
Scholl said he is trying to
monitor cell phone use during meetings, but added, “I can’t see everything.”
His role as board president is
“to make sure I monitor that” and to address those concerns while abiding by
the board policies and procedures.
“We have rules for a reason.
That’s what we have to go by. The public expects us to do that and we have to
live up to their expectations,” Scholl said.
Complaints filed with the Grand
Jury are held confidential. Any citizen may file a complaint. The Grand Jury
acts on complaints that deal with a county department, any city in the county,
all school districts and “special purpose or taxing districts in the county.”
Additionally, filing rules state that complaints should be submitted “after all
attempts to correct a situation have been explored, and without success.”
No comments:
Post a Comment