An ordinance enacted to crack down on noise, trash, and other problems associated with short-term vacation rentals in unincorporated Riverside County is flawed, according to a new report.
The
civil grand jury report suggests ways to bolster enforcement of rules to rein
in short-term rentals that become neighborhood nuisances. A revised ordinance
is in the works, although it’s not clear when it might come before the Board of
Supervisors.
“Without
serious enforcement efforts, the ordinance and its rules will become another
lost opportunity for real change and leave the neighbors of the (rentals) with
little leverage to preserve their community’s quality of life,” the 16-page
report reads.
County
spokeswoman Brooke Federico said via email that the county is reviewing the
report, which was posted online this month, and will provide “a thorough
response” by the legal deadline. By law, agencies that are the subjects of
grand jury reports must respond, usually within 90 days.
In an email, Supervisor Kevin Jeffries, who has voiced concerns about short-term rentals, said his office has heard “from residents who are concerned with the bad actors in the rental industry” who ruin things “for those who just want a little extra income while respecting their neighbors.”
“We
are reviewing the grand jury findings to see where their ideas can be
incorporated in the new regulations,” he said.
The
jury is a rotating group of citizens empaneled by a judge to examine public
agencies’ inner workings, point out problems and recommend improvements.
According to the report, the number of short-term rentals, often leased through
online services like Airbnb, grew from 268 in 2016 — the year the board passed
its ordinance — to 567 in 2020, a 111% increase.
Short-term
rentals brought in $1.6 million in tax revenue last year, the report found. But
that often comes at a cost for neighbors dealing with late-night partying,
traffic, illegal parking, trash-strewn lawns and other problems.
Cities
in Riverside County have taken their own steps to address short-term rental
nuisances. Last October, Murrieta’s City Council voted to limit short-term
rentals to larger estates and rural areas.
While
the short-term rental ordinance for unincorporated areas like Temecula Valley
Wine Country requires permits for rentals and a complaint hotline, unlike other
Southern California counties, it doesn’t require on-site rental inspections,
proof of insurance or agreements to hold the county harmless from
rental-associated liabilities, the jury found.
Noise
violations can carry a $100 fine, but code enforcement officials said the fine
is too low to encourage compliance, according to the report. More code enforcement
staff could lead to better enforcement of short-term rental rules, and fees for
short-term rental permits and renewals should be increased to pay for that
added enforcement, the jury recommended.
The
revised ordinance, as currently written, “does not provide enough protection
for, nor does it allow input from neighboring residences of Short Term Rental
properties,” the report reads.
The
jury recommended the revised ordinance include requirements for property
inspections and an indemnification agreement to shield the county, among other
provisions.
Code
enforcement, planning, and the Sheriff’s Department must “collaboratively
pursue a process … (to) adequately address noise complaints” and databases of
short-term rental certificates and transient occupancy tax certificates should
be reconciled to make sure the county isn’t missing out on any revenue, the
jury concluded.
Riverside
Press-Gazette
By JEFF HORSEMAN
June 19, 2021
No comments:
Post a Comment