City Councilman Sean Elo-Rivera wants to axe a century-old city ordinance that allows free trash pickup for many single-family homeowners.
Blog note: This article refers to several San Diego
County Grand Jury reports.
City Councilman Sean Elo-Rivera wants
to axe a century-old city ordinance that allows free trash pickup for many
single-family homeowners while the city and renters pick up the tab.
Elo-Rivera, who chairs the City
Council's environment committee, said at a Voice of San Diego member event
Wednesday that he plans to have the committee take up the issue later this year
and consider a ballot measure among other options to nix the law.
"We want to talk about this later
this year and I'm serious, this needs to go," said Elo-Rivera, who
represents communities including City Heights and Talmadge. "We're gonna
to try to make that happen."
A
potential ballot measure and even a committee hearing on the topic would mark a
significant shift for a policy that has survived countless calls from
advocates, the San Diego County Grand Jury and others to repeal it because it
shortchanges the city out of a charge that citizens elsewhere pay and creates
inequities between renters and single-family homeowners – and even among
single-family homeowners who pay and those who don't.
The so-called People's Ordinance hearkens back to 1919, when 85 percent of voters supported a measure mandating that the city collect trash from homes and allowed city leaders to levy fees for it. The city never implemented the latter charges, which meant the city must pick up trash at single-family homes without a special fee. In the mid-1980s, the ordinance was updated to bar free service for new apartments in condos.
That's meant San Diegans who live in single-family homes generally get free trash service and those who don't pay for trash service. It's also meant the city doesn't have funds other municipalities count on to pay for things like public safety and infrastructure.
The city's
independent budget analyst wrote in a memo last year that providing trash collection
to single-family homes costs the city $36.3 million a year – and that was
before a costly new organics recycling law set to take effect in
January that's projected to add millions more to the cost.
Earlier this year, the Council's environment committee approved a work plan calling for a review of "the racial and socioeconomic disparities the ordinance leads to and options for amending the ordinance, to include a possible 2022 ballot measure."
The work plan suggested the review
would occur by this September.
The
progressive-leaning Center on Policy Initiatives is among the groups that have
for years railed against the People's Ordinance.
"The trash ordinance (…) is a
prime example of providing a tax cut or fee cut to people who are the most
advantaged in the system," Greene said. "I mean, I know it's hard to
be a homeowner in this region. It's tough. It's expensive, but if you have the
ability to do that, to be the people also not having to pay a fee that folks who
live in apartments do pay as part of their rent is an example of a city that
hasn't thought about equity in its approaches."
Elo-Rivera agreed.
"That's 35 or $40 million every
year that we are subsidizing for folks who are much better positioned to absorb
that cost than those who don't," Elo-Rivera said. "It's wild, and
there's neighborhoods where you can, you know, you walk down the street and you
see a nice single-family home next to an apartment building. And you say,
'Which one of those families gets free trash pickup?' It's not the one who
needs it."
But City Councilman Chris Cate, a
Republican who also serves on the environment committee, said Wednesday he
would "probably not" support a repeal of the People's Ordinance,
underscoring the resistance any repeal movement is likely to face from folks
like Cate who are naturally resistant to tax or fee hikes.
Former Mayor Kevin
Faulconer avoided the issue even after allies at the San Diego County Taxpayers
Association, where Cate once worked, voted in 2016 to recommend removing
or amending the People's Ordinance.
Mayor Todd Gloria, a Democrat, has
often spoken of the city's structural budget issues but has thus far not
specified whether he would support a repeal of the People's Ordinance.
When the city
was facing devastating budget deficits earlier this year as a result
of COVID-19 closures, interim COO Jay Goldstone said during a virtual meeting
of the National Albondigas Political Society that the People's Ordinance was
among the issues on the table as the city looked at its budget challenges. He
noted that other cities he'd worked for charged all residents for trash
pick-up.
City spokeswoman Nicole Darling later clarified that Goldstone's response was "made to provide a more long-term picture" rather than a proposal for the 2022 budget process.
Elo-Rivera said Thursday he is prepared
to start a fight he believes is necessary to help address structural budget
gaps.
"Three separate county grand
juries have said it must go, but the city has yet to take action,"
Elo-Rivera wrote in a statement. "I would be negligent in my duties as the
environment committee chair to not investigate alternatives to what has
resulted in a drain on the city's general fund, an unfair refuse collection
system and an obstacle to achieving our waste diversion and recycling
goals."
Patch.com
By Lisa Halverstadt, the Voice of San Diego
April 22, 2021
Voice of San Diego is
a nonprofit news organization supported by our members. We reveal why things
are the way they are and expose facts that people in power might not want out
there and explain complex local public policy issues so you can be engaged and
make good decisions. Sign up for our newsletters at voiceofsandiego.org/newsletters/.
No comments:
Post a Comment